1999 Audi TT vs. 2010 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 569 kg more than 1999 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi TT. 2010 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1999 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1999 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 2010 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | TT | Rodius |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |