1999 BMW 318 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1999 BMW 318 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1999 BMW 318. (192 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 840 kg more than 1999 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW 318 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 318 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
