1999 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1999 BMW 320. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 463 kg more than 1999 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW 320. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

1999 BMW 320 2004 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 320 XK
Year Released 1999 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1951 cc 4194 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 541 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1833 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 75 L