1999 BMW 323 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 BMW 323 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW 323 (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW 323 weights approximately 687 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW 323 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW 323 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 323 | 102 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1457 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |