1999 BMW 323 vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1999 BMW 323. (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW 323 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW 323. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW 323. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1999 BMW 323 has manual transmission. 1999 BMW 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 BMW 323 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make BMW Suzuki
Model 323 Equator
Year Released 1999 2012
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 3953 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 170 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5600 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3560 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]