1999 BMW 328 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1999 BMW 328 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW 328 (193 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW 328 weights approximately 367 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW 328 (279 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1999 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW 328 | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 328 | EH |
Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |