1999 BMW 330 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1999 BMW 330 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1999 BMW 330. (185 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW 330. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 415 kg more than 1999 BMW 330. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW 330 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 330 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 95 L |
