1999 BMW 529 vs. 1993 Mazda 121
To start off, 1999 BMW 529 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 BMW 529 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW 529 (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 121. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW 529 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW 529 weights approximately 805 kg more than 1993 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 BMW 529 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW 529. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW 529 (410 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1999 BMW 529 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW 529 | 1993 Mazda 121 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 529 | 121 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 43 L |