1999 BMW LMR vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 BMW LMR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1999 BMW LMR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW LMR. (355 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW LMR.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW LMR | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | LMR | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2140 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |