1999 BMW LMR vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 BMW LMR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 477 more horse power than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW LMR weights approximately 170 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW LMR (355 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. (291 Nm). This means 1999 BMW LMR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW LMR | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | LMR | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 4375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 291 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1445 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
