1999 BMW LMR vs. 2002 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2002 Mercury Villager is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW LMR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW LMR would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 2002 Mercury Villager. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Villager weights approximately 170 kg more than 1999 BMW LMR.
Because 1999 BMW LMR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW LMR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW LMR (355 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercury Villager. (271 Nm). This means 1999 BMW LMR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercury Villager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW LMR | 2002 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | LMR | Villager |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 3274 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1785 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2860 mm |
