1999 BMW LMR vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW LMR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW LMR would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1999 BMW LMR. (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW LMR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW LMR weights approximately 535 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 635 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW LMR. (355 Nm). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW LMR. 1999 BMW LMR has automatic transmission and 2003 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 2003 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 BMW LMR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW LMR | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | BMW | Lotec |
Model | LMR | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 990 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1080 kg |