1999 BMW LMR vs. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW LMR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW LMR would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 400 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (200 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 465 kg more than 1999 BMW LMR.
Because 1999 BMW LMR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW LMR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW LMR (355 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (298 Nm). This means 1999 BMW LMR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW LMR | 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | LMR | Uplander |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2080 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2950 mm |
