1999 BMW LMR vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW LMR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW LMR would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (215 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 101 kg more than 1999 BMW LMR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW LMR (355 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 1999 BMW LMR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW LMR | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | BMW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMR | CLK |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 3196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1716 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2860 mm |
