1999 BMW LMR vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW LMR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW LMR would be higher. At 5,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW LMR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW LMR (600 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac STS. (253 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW LMR should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 167 kg more than 1999 BMW LMR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW LMR (355 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm). This means 1999 BMW LMR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW LMR | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | LMR | STS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 3563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 253 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1782 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2960 mm |
