1999 BMW M28i vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW M28i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW M28i would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW M28i (250 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW M28i should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW M28i weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW M28i (355 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 1999 BMW M28i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW M28i | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M28i | UTE |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2950 mm |