1999 BMW M28i vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW M28i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW M28i would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 BMW M28i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW M28i (250 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW M28i should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW M28i weights approximately 400 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW M28i (355 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1999 BMW M28i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW M28i | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | M28i | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2490 mm |
