1999 BMW M5 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW M5 would be higher. At 4,900 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1999 BMW M5. (401 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW M5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW M5 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW M5 (499 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 1999 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW M5 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | M5 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4900 cc | 3997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 499 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2890 mm |
