1999 BMW M5 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW M5 would be higher. At 4,900 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW M5 (401 HP) has 300 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW M5 weights approximately 159 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW M5 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M5 | C30 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4900 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |