1999 BMW V12 vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 BMW V12 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 360 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW V12 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 523 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (386 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW V12 | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | V12 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5990 cc | 5040 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 550 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2570 mm |
