1999 BMW V12 vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW V12 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 2003 Jaguar XF has manual transmission. 2003 Jaguar XF will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW V12 | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | V12 | XF |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5990 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 550 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1350 kg |
