1999 BMW V12 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 885 kg more than 1999 BMW V12.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW V12 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | V12 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5990 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 440 Nm |
Top Speed | 350 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2890 mm |