1999 BMW V12 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. (440 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac STS-V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. (584 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW V12 | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | V12 | STS-V |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5990 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 550 HP | 440 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 584 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |
