1999 BMW V12 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. (820 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW V12 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | V12 | Kodiak |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5990 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 550 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 820 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
