1999 BMW V12 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW V12 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | V12 | Ka |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5990 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2450 mm |