1999 BMW V12 vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.

Because 1999 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 764 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3. 1999 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: