1999 BMW V12 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (268 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac ATS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW V12 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 556 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (353 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW V12 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | V12 | ATS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5990 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2772 mm |