1999 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW X5 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2012 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 646 kg more than 1999 BMW X5.
Because 1999 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-350 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW X5. (439 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW X5 | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 439 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2184 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 132 L |