1999 BMW Z8 vs. 2006 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z8 would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z8 (400 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac DTS. (275 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac DTS.
Because 1999 BMW Z8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z8 (500 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac DTS. (396 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z8 | 2006 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z8 | DTS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4939 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 396 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 68 L |