1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2050 mm |