1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | Z9 | F 11 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2260 mm |