1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1975 BMW 1602
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1602. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 1975 BMW 1602 | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | Z9 | 1602 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3901 cc | 1574 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2510 mm |
