1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW Z9 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Z9 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4397 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2480 mm |