1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW Z9 weights approximately 304 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Z9 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4397 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2680 mm |