1999 BMW Z9 vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW Z9 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1986 Mercury Sable.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | Z9 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4397 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
