1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (515 Nm). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2950 mm |