1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2500.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2500. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | Z9 | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3901 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2990 mm |
