1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 2004 Mazda MX | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | Z9 | MX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3901 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2760 mm |
