1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2006 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (256 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac SRX. (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 2006 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z9 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3901 cc | 3562 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2960 mm |
