1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2006 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 2006 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Z9 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4397 cc | 3497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2920 mm |
