1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2008 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW Z9. (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW Z9.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2008 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | XLR |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 4371 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 561 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2690 mm |