1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2012 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2012 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW Z9. (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW Z9.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2012 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3302 mm |