1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2012 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2012 Kia Sedona is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Sedona (271 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Sedona. (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2012 Kia Sedona | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | Z9 | Sedona |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3020 mm |