1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | ATS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2776 mm |