1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW Z9 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | XTS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2831 mm |