1999 BMW Z9 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z9. (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z9.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 BMW Z9 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | Z9 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3901 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4684 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1798 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2946 mm |
