1999 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Bristol Blenheim | 2006 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | BLS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |