1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron (552 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 394 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron (881 Nm) has 662 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Bugatti | Toyota |
Model | EB 18-3 Chiron | Matrix |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6255 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 552 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 881 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2601 mm |