1999 Buick Cielo vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1999 Buick Cielo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Cielo (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Buick Cielo (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Buick Cielo | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Cielo | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1300 mm |
