1999 Buick Cielo vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1999 Buick Cielo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Cielo (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Buick Cielo (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Buick Cielo | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Buick | ZAZ |
Model | Cielo | 966 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |